Charles Kennedy

About Charles Kennedy: A Tragic Flaw

 

'Does it trouble you that every single politician to whom we've spoken in preparing for this interview said the same thing – you're interviewing Charles Kennedy? I hope he's sober.' Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight

 

Charles Kennedy is an enigma. A talented strategist and an intuitive media performer and communicator – a rare combination – he became one of the best-known and most liked politicians of his generation, appearing on chat shows and seeming to break the mould of more conventional politicians. He led the Liberal Democrats during a remarkably successful period in the party's turbulent history to achieve the best result for a third party in more than eighty years at the general election of 2005. Yet throughout there were doubts. As a shy, introverted man Kennedy was often uncomfortable with his persona as a public figure. He faced criticism of inactivity whenever the media spotlight turned away from him.

 

Kennedy had an extraordinary start to his career as a member of Parliament, winning his seat for the Social Democratic Party against all expectations at just twenty-three. He was one of the few politicians to emerge with credit from the disastrous merger of the SDP and the Liberal Party in 1988 and was tipped from an early age as a future leader. His achievements once he became leader were considerable. He broke with the strategy of his predecessors to step out from Labour's shadow and to establish the Liberal Democrats as an independent and growing opposition force. As Britain prepared to invade Iraq, he became the first opposition party leader to oppose British military action since Hugh Gaitskell led protests against the Suez campaign in 1956.

 

But nemesis was near. Persistent worries circulated privately about his health, with growing rumours of a barely managed drink problem. Slowly the secret of his alcoholism was shared among senior party figures. At first they tried to support him but, after a seires of calamitous performances in public and private, confidence in him gradually drained away. The confrontation of Kennedy by some of his ablest MPs precipitated one of the most dramatic episodes in recent British political history as he tried to fight his critics before being forced to relinquish leadership of his party.

 

As a correspondent with The Times Greg Hurst was closer to the Liberal Democrats during Charles Kennedy's leadership than any other journalist. This biography is the gripping story of a talented, attractive occasionally courageous but tragically flawed man. Drawing on frank accounts from those closest to Kennedy, Hurst guides us through his difficult start as Liberal Democrat leader, his decision to oppose the Iraq war, the party's growing electoral strength and the events that led to Kennedy's resignation and the subsequent election of Sir Menzies Campbell as leader.

The Author

Greg Hurst

 

Greg Hurst is a political correspondent for The Times and reported on the Liberal Democrats throughout Charles Kennedy's six and a half years as leader. He accompanied Kennedy during the general election campaigns in 2001 and 2005 and knows him well. He lives in Maidenhead, Berkshire with his family.

Reviews

 

'An excellent account of how a highly attractive and popular politician self-destructed'

The Observer (Books of the Year)

 

'It is a model work of contemporary history, balanced and comprehensive'

The Times

 

'Meticulously researched and displaying a fine turn of phrase... a well-presented and perceptive history of the last 25 years of the third party of British politics'

Whitehall & Westminster World

 

'An account that is as frank as it is revealing... It is commendably fair to the subject, and portrays the truth without sensationalising Kennedy's misfortunes. As befits a first-rate journalist, Hurst presents an account based on facts and recollections gleaned from a wide range of interview-based sources. His style is reader-friendly and his general approach reputable and revealing'

The Tablet

 

'Well written, perceptive and comprehensive'

The Journal of Liberal History